|
|
|
Team New Zealand take Swiss champions to court
Law Firm News |
2008/03/06 08:58
|
| The New Zealand syndicate for the next America's Cup race said Thursday it is seeking tens of millions of euros in compensation from Swiss champions Alinghi over the event's postponement.pTeam New Zealand said it had filed a case with a New York court claiming damages for breach of contract arising from an agreement covering its entry for the 33rd edition of yachting's showpiece event./ppThe agreement included an understanding entered into by (Alinghi boss) Ernesto Bertarelli that the America's Cup would go ahead in 2009, it said in a statement./ppIt's now probable we might not see a normal regatta until 2011, Team New Zealand's managing director Grant Dalton said in the statement./ppThe statement did not indicate the amount of damages it was seeking. But Dalton told AFP in a telephone interview from New York that it would be tens of millions of euros./ppWe have a duty to protect the investment in the team over many years by a wide range of loyal supporters, Dalton said./ppWe also have an obligation to honour the trust shown by the hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders who have supported the team through the years./ppAlinghi retained the America's Cup by beating Team New Zealand in a hugely successful event in the Spanish port of Valencia in July./ppBut the 33rd edition of the race was indefinitely postponed because of a legal dispute between Alinghi and US syndicate Oracle over the rules./ppTeam New Zealand said it has also filed a second case in a Federal Court under US anti-trust laws./ppThat suit claims Alinghi has acted to stifle competition for the Cup and for the right that goes with it of conducting future events by accepting the Spanish syndicate Desafio as its challenger of record, thereby enabling it to impose rules for the next event that were competely one-sided./ppOracle last July filed a lawsuit in the US against Alinghi's decision to name Desafio as its official challenger of record, which gave it the right to negotiate the format of the America's Cup with the Swiss syndicate./ppIn November, a New York court ruled in favour of Oracle and said the US team should be Alinghi's challenger of record./ppBertarelli had the chance to accept a reasonable proposal from Oracle, which was also signed by the majority of the challengers, and which would have allowed the America's Cup to be held in 2009, Dalton said. He would not do so./ppAlinghi said it was disappointed by the action by Team New Zealand, given their previous public acceptance and commitment to the competition./ppThese actions are totally without merit, wildly miss the target and will be defended rigorously, Lucien Masmejan, Alinghi's legal counsel, said in a statement./ppWe share the sailing community's frustration in the delays affecting the America's Cup but Alinghi, as trustee, is duty bound to defend its position in the current legal action and to preserve the integrity of the America's Cup./ppThe format of the 33rd America's Cup challenge is still subject to an imminent ruling by the New York court, with a multihull duel between Alinghi and Oracle seen as the most likely outcome, rather than a regatta involving several teams./ppThe two teams have begun training in catamarans in Valencia in preparation for such an event./ppThe delay in staging the next America's Cup is harming every challenging syndicate as they have to stretch budgets for a two-year campaign over three or perhaps four years, Dalton said./p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court Skeptical of Passenger Rights Law
Law Firm News |
2008/03/06 04:57
|
| A federal appeals panel seemed impatient Wednesday with arguments supporting the first law in the nation requiring airlines to provide food, water, clean toilets and fresh air to passengers trapped in a plane delayed on the ground.pThe three judges expressed skepticism that states should be allowed to impose such a law on an industry already subject to extensive federal oversight. It was likely, they implied through their questions, that federal authority would pre-empt state laws on the issue./ppNew York's law requires relief for people who have been trapped in a plane on the ground for at least three hours. It was passed after passengers at Kennedy International Airport were stranded on planes for more than 10 hours with no food and overflowing toilets./ppThe court did not immediately rule on the constitutionality of New York's Airline Passenger Bill of Rights./ppThe judges said they were sympathetic to the needs of passengers on planes, but they seemed to agree that only the federal government can regulate airline services./ppJudge Brian M. Cogan said New York's law might lead to multiple solutions by states nationwide that would subject airlines to all kinds of requirements./ppJudge Debra Ann Livingston agreed./ppThere is a patchwork problem in that every state should be concerned about this and probably would write different regulations, she said./ppEven though the judges had not yet ruled, Judge Richard C. Wesley defended their apparent stance./ppThis is a pre-emption issue. Judges aren't heartless people in black robes. Three judges must decide whether New York stepped over the pre-emption line, Wesley said./ppThe law was challenged before the appeals court by the Air Transport Association of America, the industry trade group representing leading U.S. airlines./ppSeth Waxman, a lawyer for the trade group, told the judges that a dozen other states were considering laws similar to New York's law. He said Congress was considering its own legislation./ppIf regulation is required in this area, it must be national to avoid what otherwise is a patchwork solution, Waxman said./ppBarbara Underwood, arguing in defense of the law, said it required minimal standards and protected the public./ppShe said planes in line for takeoff might, after three hours, be forced to return to the gate to pick up more food and water and empty its restrooms or need to summon a delivery service to perform those chores./ppA recent federal report showed that about 24 percent of flights nationally arrived late in the first 10 months of last year, which was the industry's second-worst performance record since comparable data began being collected in 1995./ppKennedy airport had the third-worst on-time arrival record of any major U.S. airport through October, behind the New York area's other two major airports, LaGuardia and Newark, according to the report./ppWesley called it a health and safety issue./ppWhat it really is about is human dignity, Underwood said./ppQueens Assemblyman Michael Gianaris, a Democrat, the prime sponsor of New York's Airline Passenger Bill of Rights, said after the arguments that he was not discouraged by the questions posed by the judges. He said he would welcome a national law protecting airline customers./ppI'm hopeful the judges will preserve the law, he said./p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gault Pleads Guilty; Facing 50 Years In Prison
U.S. Court News |
2008/03/06 04:03
|
pA former dog trainer who was accused of hiding a runaway girl in his West Harford home for nearly a year pleaded guilty Wednesday in Superior Court in Hartford to eight felony charges which are expected to net him a lengthy stay in prison./ppAdam Gault, 41, entered guilty pleas to two counts of first-degree kidnapping, four counts of second-degree sexual assault, risk of injury to a minor and conspiracy to commit first-degree kidnapping./ppAssistant State's Attorney David Zagaja said the state is recommending a 50-year prison term for Gault, which would be suspended after 30 years incarceration. He would then spend 20 years on probation./ppSentencing was set for May 19. If he had chosen to go to trial, he would have faced a maximum of 160 years./ppJudge David Gold told the defendant he was considering imposing 50 years, suspended after 25 years, but that he would consider increasing the term at the time of sentencing after getting a pre-sentence report./ppGold gave Gault the option of accepting a higher sentence, or withdrawing his guilty plea at that time./ppGault was found competent to stand trial in February. He had faced nearly 40 charges. The bulk of the charges, including kidnapping, unlawful restraint, risk of injury to a minor, reckless endangerment and sexual assault, were in connection with the Bloomfield teenager who was found in his home. The girl, who was 14 when she disappeared is now 16./ppA second complaint brought by a second woman was lodged subsequent to his arrest./ppAt Wednesday's 90-minute hearing, Gault appeared clean-shaven, with a short-cropped hair. On several occasions, when the judge asked him how he pleaded, he responded with I'm guilty/ppHis other responses were limited to Yes sir or no sir./ppMarc Needelman, the attorney who represents the family of the 14-year-old, said he expected his clients to appear at Gault's sentencing and also make recommendations for appropriate sentences against his co-defendants, Ann Murphy and Kimberly Cray./ppGold said they would attempt to accommodate the family by having the two women appear that day./ppGault, who lived on Newington Road in West Hartford, was arrested last June when Bloomfield and West Hartford police discovered the teenager, who had been reported missing for almost a year, in a locked storage closet behind a dresser in his home./ppGault and the girl's mother and stepfather, who operate a dog day care and kennel in Bloomfield, knew each other professionally. The girl had worked for Gault in his dog training business./ppThe police were executing a search warrant for Gault's house and his DNA on June 6 when they came across the locked, hidden storage space and found the girl inside. At the time, investigators believed they were searching for evidence linking Gault to the girl's disappearance and possible demise./ppAccording to court documents, DNA testing on a fetus that the victim aborted in May showed Gault impregnated the girl.
/p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judge Rejects Murtha Deposition Request
Court News |
2008/03/06 03:01
|
| Attorneys for a Marine officer facing court-martial on charges he mishandled the aftermath of the deaths of 24 Iraqis may not force a Pennsylvania congressman to testify in the case, a military judge ruled.pAttorneys for Lt. Col. Jeffrey R. Chessani want to question Rep. John Murtha over his public statement that the Marines killed in cold blood during the attack in Haditha. Murtha said he had been briefed by the highest levels of the military about the case and that officers covered it up./ppChessani's attorneys, who released the ruling Wednesday, said they will appeal if the judge doesn't reconsider./ppChessani is the highest-ranking U.S. serviceman to face a combat-related court-martial since the Vietnam War./ppWhen the congressman said he was briefed by the highest levels, we need to know who they are, said Brian Rooney, Chessani's civilian defense attorney./ppRooney said Murtha's deposition would confirm what he said to the press is accurate./ppMurtha's spokesman, Matthew Mazonkey, said the congressman had no comment. A telephone call to a Marine Corps spokesman was not immediately returned./ppChessani has been charged with dereliction of duty and violation of a lawful order on allegations that he mishandled the aftermath of the Nov. 19, 2005, shooting deaths in Haditha./ppHe faces court-martial on April 28. If convicted on all counts, he faces up to three years in prison./ppFour enlisted Marines were initially charged with murder in the case and four officers were charged with failing to investigate the deaths. Charges against several of the men have been dropped, and none will face murder charges./p |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Marketing News RSS
