|
|
|
American Bar Association Finds Kagan “Well-Qualified”
Law Firm Press |
2010/06/28 02:00
|
pThe American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary has rated U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice nominee Elena Kagan as “well-qualified,” the highest mark the committee offers. /ppSince 1953, the ABA has had a role in reviewing the qualifications of federal court nominees, including Supreme Court nominees.nbsp; A committee of 15 members — two from the Ninth Circuit, one from each of the 12 other federal judicial circuits and one who serves as chair — measures the individual’s integrity, professional competence and judicial temperament.nbsp; /ppWhile the standing committee insulates its work from all other activities of the association, ABA president Carolyn Lamm is familiar with the procedures used to evaluate a nominee’s qualifications.nbsp; Lamm served as chair of the committee from 1995 to 1996.nbsp; /ppLamm explained, “In terms of legal competence, you’re looking at legal, analytical ability.nbsp; You’re looking at what they’ve written, how they’ve argued, whether they’ve argued — how they’ve done it.nbsp; We listen to opponents, or from those on the same side and from judges to find out, how did they do as lawyers and what is their legal ability?”/ppA comprehensive evaluation is conducted by interviewing a broad spectrum of the legal community, reviewing pertinent materials written by the nominee, and interviewing the nominee personally.nbsp; After the evaluation is complete, the findings are assembled into a report which is reviewed by each member of the standing committee who then individually rates the nominee as either “well-qualified,” “qualified” or “not-qualified.”nbsp; The majority vote constitutes the official rating of the ABA standing committee./ppTo merit a “well-qualified” rating, a Supreme Court nominee must be a preeminent member of the legal profession, have outstanding legal ability and exceptional breadth of experience, and meet the highest standards of integrity, professional competence and judicial temperament.nbsp; Kagan’s well-qualified rating was unanimous with one abstention. /ppInvestigations of nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court differ in respect to other federal nominees in that they are conducted after the president has selected a nominee; they involve all members of the standing committee; a team or teams of law professors examine the nominee’s legal writings; and a group of practicing lawyers with Supreme Court experience also examines the writings. /ppKagan currently serves as solicitor general of the United States.nbsp; She was nominated to fill the seat of John Paul Stevens, who will step down at the end of the 2009-2010 Supreme Court term. /ppWhen asked how the standing committee evaluates nominees who may not have had prior judicial experience, standing committee chair Kim Askew noted, “There are many, many judges who have served on courts who have never been judges and are very effective judges.nbsp; We look at what they do and we go to the three criteria — professional competence, integrity, and temperament — and we look at what they have done in their legal careers in the practice of law, which may or may not be on a bench.”/ppThe past five U.S. Supreme Court nominees were also found well-qualified by the committee./ppThe Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to begin its confirmation hearing for Kagan on June 28.nbsp; Kim Askew, the chair of the Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, has been invited to testify relating to the standing committee’s rating.
/p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nationwide Immigration Law Service
Law Firm Press |
2010/06/21 09:05
|
The Law Offices of McHenry amp; Associates, LLP. We are aa href=http://www.sandiego-immigrationlawyer.com/font color=#336699 San Diego immigration law firm /font/aspecializing in deportation defense, family based and employment based immigration. We provide exceptional legal services to all those who wish to live and work in the United States legally. The Law Offices of McHenry amp; Associates limits its practice exclusively to U.S. Immigration Law. Whether you are an individual, family or business, if you are in need of an immigration lawyer in San Diego, call the Law Offices of McHenry amp; Associates to discuss your immigration options.
•Immigration violations
•Deportation defense/removal proceedings
•Marriage petitions or violations
•Family-based green card petitions
•Employment-based green cards
•Extraordinary persons visas
•Travel permission and re-entry
•Immigration waivers
•Citizenship and naturalization assistance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Fraud Liability May Hit More Defendants
Legal News |
2010/06/21 09:05
|
pPeter J. Henning follows issues involving securities law and white-collar crime for DealBook’s White Collar Watch. As Congress works on the final version of the financial regulatory bill, a major change in liability for corporate law firms, accounting firms and investment banks has been inserted into the measure. House members of the conference committee agreed to add a provision offered by Representative Maxine Waters, Democrat of California, to restore aiding and abetting liability for private securities fraud cases./ppThe impact of the amendment is significant because it expands the potential defendants in securities fraud class actions to include more than just the company accused of making misstatements or omissions, and these are defendants with deep pockets.
/p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Law firm: BP claims form flawed
Legal News |
2010/06/16 10:07
|
| pBP said Tuesday it has accelerated its process of approving payments for commercial claims related to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, but two Miami law firms representing fisherman said the oil company’s claim forms are flawed./ppBP said it approved initial payments toward 90 percent of commercial large-loss claims that have been filed as a result the ongoing oil disaster. The U.K.-based oil giant said it approved payment of 337 checks for a total of $16 million to businesses that have filed claims in excess of $5,000./ppThis week, the two firms, Grossman Roth, P.A. and Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price amp; Axelrod LLP, began representing 600 fishermen from the Florida Keys Commercial Fisherman's Association. They warned that BP’s oil spill claim forms are seriously flawed./pp“The claim form that BP put on its website is inadequate under the federal Oil Pollution Act,” said Andy Yaffa of Grossman Roth./p |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Marketing News RSS
