|
|
|
Salvatore Scanio Attorney
Law Firm Press |
2014/04/10 15:47
|
Representative Cases
- Successfully represented PNC Bank in obtaining summary judgment dismissing $5m case arising from wire and account activity related to distressed real estate investment scheme: Ivanhoe Investment Partners, LP, et al, v. PNC Bank, N.A., et al. (Md. 2014)
- Phillips Realty Management, LLC v. PNC Bank, N.A. (D. Md. 2013): represented PNC in obtaining early dismissal of $1.5m UCC check fraud suit
- Represented Northern Trust in suit to recover $16 million loan loss: Northern Trust Bank, FSB v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (E.D. Va. 2011)
- Defended Travelers/St. Paul in complex $18 million loan loss investigations and multidistrict coverage litigation: United Bankshares, Inc., et al. v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., et al. (S.D. W.Va.); St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. v. United Bank (E.D. Va. 2010)
- Represented client in action against Big-4 accounting firms for malpractice in broker-dealer/asset management firm audits: Vigilant Ins. Co. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (Conn. 2011) and Vigilant Ins. Co. v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP (Conn. 2010)
- Represented South African clients in action against U.S. technology company arising from data compression software claims: Hentiq 3343 (Pty) Ltd., et al. v. Qbit, LLC, et al. (D.C. 2009)
- Represented client in UCC warranty action for forged indorsements: National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Kopernik Fed. Bank, FSB (D. Md. 2009)
- Represented client in $6 million action involving fraudulent account opening and drafts: Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (Pa. 2007)
- Represented client in UCC warranty claims involving unauthorized indorsements against multiple depositaries
- Represented client in suit against bank and conspirators involving unauthorized international wire transfers: Zhang v. NationsBank, et al. (D.D.C. 2007)
- Represented client in UCC action arising from fraudulent account opening: Travelers Cas. & Surety Co. v. Bank of America, N.A. (E.D. Mo. 2007)
- Represented client in actions involving fraudulent account opening, corporate-payee checks, and unauthorized ACH and ATM deposits: National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (C.D. Cal. 2005)
- Represented a large specialized lender in connection with federal and state oversight relating to lending practices and its relationships with insured financial institutions
- Represented bank through trial and appeals in Winstar-related breach of contract suit for lost profits upon disallowance of $30 million of regulatory capital: Citizens Financial Services, FSB v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2005)
- Represented AIG in suit against depositary/drawee on altered checks: National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. SAC Fed. Credit Union, et al. (D. Neb. 2003)
http://leadferret.com/directory/person/salvatore-scanio/10556963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court rejects early appeal of surveillance ruling
Law Firm Press |
2014/04/08 11:41
|
The Supreme Court has declined an early look at a constitutional challenge to the National Security Agency's bulk collection of millions of Americans' telephone records.
Conservative lawyer Larry Klayman persuaded a federal judge in December to rule that the agency's activities likely violate the Constitution's ban on unreasonable searches. The justices on Monday rejected Klayman's unusual request to bypass the traditional appeals process and hear the case immediately.
Klayman says the case is too important to wait for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to reach a decision. The district court judge granted an injunction against the NSA, but put it on hold pending a government appeal.
The Obama administration has defended the NSA program as a crucial tool against terrorism. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EU court nixes government bulk data collection
Legal News Feed |
2014/04/08 11:41
|
The European Union's top court says key legislation allowing governments to collect data on citizens' communications for law-enforcement purposes is invalid.
The European Court of Justice in Luxembourg on Tuesday ruled the so-called data retention directive is too far-reaching and offers too few safeguards to protect people's right to privacy, creating an impression that "private lives are the subject of constant surveillance."
The legislation allows the storage of phone calls or online communication records for at least six months to help prevent serious crimes such as terrorism. The data typically reveal who was involved in the communication, when and how often, but not its content.
The court says the 2006 legislation represents a "particularly serious interference with fundamental rights." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Court Refuses To Overturn Arizona Marijuana Ruling
Legal News Feed |
2014/04/03 15:15
|
The Supreme Court has refused to overturn Arizona court rulings ordering the Yuma County sheriff to return marijuana that was seized from a woman with a California medical marijuana authorization honored by Arizona.
The justices' order was issued without comment Monday in the case of Valerie Okun, who had marijuana in her car when a Border Patrol agent stopped her and her husband in Yuma County, Ariz., in 2011. She was charged with marijuana possession crimes, but the charges were dropped when she provided proof she was authorized to possess marijuana under California's medical marijuana program. Arizona's medical marijuana law allows people with authorizations from other states to have marijuana in Arizona.
But the Yuma County sheriff refused to return Okun's marijuana, even after Arizona courts ruled in her favor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Marketing News RSS
